Stresemann’s 102-day
stint as Chancellor from August to November 1923 is regarded as the turning
point in the crisis. He has been given credit as an extraordinary German
statesman, akin to Bismarck, but is his role in ending Hyperinflation overstated?
Stresemann’s
bold decision to send the Ruhr strikers back to work, while promising to resume
reparations payments, was pivotal in restoring German industrial output. It
also relived the government of paying the strikers, reducing the need to devalue
the currency further.
However, as
Pfleiderer explains, the stabilisation of the currency, can be credited to the ideas
of economist Helfferich, finance minister Luther’s implementation of these
ideas and Reichsbank President Schacht’s clever monetary policy. It involved
issuing a new Rentenmark, backed by mortgage bonds indexed to the price of
gold. This perfectly converted the new mark to be 4.2 to the dollar, as opposed
to the old 4.2 trillion!
Stresemann’s
tenure as Chancellor ended prematurely, with the SPD withdrawing support for
him. However, in his new role as Foreign Minister, he had success in finalising
the 1924 Dawes Plan. Which resumed reparations payments, but in smaller instalments
for the near term, while securing a loan of 800 million marks from the US.
Both Stresemann
and the financial experts contributed significantly to ending the inflation
crisis. Although, in many ways they paved the way for Germany to be adversely
impacted by the Great Depression. Stresemann pursued closer economic relations
to the US, and the German economy became heavily dependent on US capital, which
was withdrawn in the wake of the Wall Street Crash. While the return to the
Gold Standard helped to stabilise an out-of-control currency, it also led to
the much worse deflationary crisis Germany would experience in the early 1930’s,
which along with Brunings austerity policies, brought Hitler to power in 1933.
Stresemann had
many great achievements as a diplomat, including gaining admission to the
League of Nations and winning a Nobel Prize, however his economic policies and excessive use of Article
48 created greater problems that wouldn’t materialise until after his premature death in 1929.
No comments:
Post a Comment